When it comes to designing software, the SOLID principles are the gold standard for object-oriented programming. While Rust isn’t an object-oriented language in the strictest sense, it offers plenty of tools to apply SOLID principles effectively. With enums, traits, and strict type safety, Rust provides a solid foundation for building flexible, maintainable, and robust applications that adhere to these design principles.
Rust has garnered significant attention in the programming world for its focus on memory safety without the need for a garbage collector, making it an appealing option for systems programming, where safety and performance are both critical. By preventing entire categories of bugs like data races, buffer overflows, and null pointer dereferencing at compile time, Rust has earned a reputation as a “safe” language. However, this very focus on memory safety can lull developers into a false sense of security, leading them to overlook other kinds of programming errors, potentially causing even more serious bugs. Here’s why.
It’s easy to get carried away when you’re building a new web app. You’ve got big ideas, you picture millions of users flocking to your platform, and you start imagining the kind of infrastructure needed to handle all that traffic. So, you build for scale from day one—optimising databases, setting up powerful servers, and ensuring everything is robust enough for massive growth.
Over the past few years, the evolution of AI-driven tools like GitHub’s Copilot and other large language models (LLMs) has promised to revolutionise programming. By leveraging deep learning, these tools can generate code, suggest solutions, and even troubleshoot issues in real-time, saving developers hours of work. While these tools have obvious benefits in terms of productivity, there’s a growing concern that they may also have unintended consequences on the quality and skillset of programmers.
JetBrains Rider has garnered attention as a modern, cross-platform IDE, especially for .NET developers. However, Visual Studio remains the reigning heavyweight in the development world, thanks to years of evolution and refinement. While Rider offers impressive features, there are still several areas where Visual Studio shines brighter. Here are five reasons why Visual Studio is better than Rider.
When it comes to .NET development, Visual Studio has long been the go-to integrated development environment (IDE). However, JetBrains' Rider has emerged as a serious competitor, offering a fresh alternative with features that many developers now prefer. While both are powerful tools, here are five reasons why Rider is considered better than Visual Studio for many developers.
I use a lot of programming languages, I use them in different ways for different things because they are tools to do a job, just like a hammer is a tool to hammer in nails and a screwdriver (shockingly) drives screws… And while you can hammer in nails with a screwdriver, and you can drive screws with a hammer… They are not the best tools for those jobs.
So lets have a look at what jobs that some given languages, are good at and what they are bad at…
In the modern web landscape, understanding how HTTP servers work under the hood can be incredibly empowering. While there are many frameworks and libraries available that abstract away the complexities of building an HTTP server, sometimes it’s valuable to get back to basics and see how things work from the ground up.
In this tutorial, we will guide you through building a simple HTTP server in Rust using only the standard library, without relying on any external crates. This will give you a solid understanding of network programming in Rust and a foundation you can build on to create more complex servers in the future.
SOAP and REST have been the dominant protocols for years. However, GraphQL has emerged in the last few years as a powerful alternative, offering numerous advantages over its predecessors. In this article, we’ll explore why GraphQL is often considered better than basic REST and SOAP APIs, and why you might want to consider it for your next project.
Dear Mr. Zelnick,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to you as a dedicated member of the Kerbal Space Program (KSP) community, a group that shares an unparalleled passion for space exploration and engineering, and whose enthusiasm for the franchise has only grown since the original game’s release. I am deeply concerned about the recent decision to cancel Kerbal Space Program 2 (KSP2), a game with enormous potential that deserves another chance to succeed under the right circumstances.
Kerbal Space Program has cultivated a large and dedicated community that spans across all ages, particularly inspiring young minds to delve into the wonders of space travel and engineering. The game’s unique blend of education and entertainment has not only provided countless hours of enjoyment but has also sparked an interest in STEM fields for many children and young adults. The cancellation of KSP2 is not just a loss for the fans but a missed opportunity to continue fostering this educational impact.
The challenges KSP2 has faced since its announcement can largely be attributed to mismanagement by Take-Two and Private Division. Despite these setbacks, the core vision and potential of the game remain intact. The issues are not with the concept or the community’s enthusiasm but with the execution and oversight of the project. With the right management and development team, KSP2 can overcome its current hurdles and achieve the greatness that the community knows it is capable of.
Reconsidering the cancellation of KSP2 and investing in proper management and resources will not only save the game but also reinforce Take-Two’s commitment to its community and the educational value it brings. A revitalized KSP2 can reignite the interest of the next generation in space exploration and engineering, aligning perfectly with the growing global focus on these fields. The benefits of nurturing such interests extend beyond gaming, potentially leading to future innovations and advancements as inspired players pursue careers in STEM disciplines.
The KSP community stands ready to support and contribute to the game’s success. Our passion and dedication are unwavering, and we believe that with the right leadership, KSP2 can become a landmark title that continues to inspire and educate.
I kindly urge you to reconsider the decision to cancel Kerbal Space Program 2. Invest in the right team and management, and you will see not only a successful game but also a legacy that inspires future generations.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
The KSP Community